<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>BlackMountainSite Forum &#187; Tag: forest - Recent Topics</title>
<link>http://www.blackmountainsite.co.uk/bbpress/</link>
<description>BlackMountainSite Forum &#187; Tag: forest - Recent Topics</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 12:11:18 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>Sparhawk on "Empty land above tunnels"</title>
<link>http://www.blackmountainsite.co.uk/bbpress/topic/empty-land-above-tunnels#post-7</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 10:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Sparhawk</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">7@http://www.blackmountainsite.co.uk/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Here's something that has been bugging me for a while, I notice that the land directly above the course of tunnels is often empty, when the land all around is planted with trees (leaving a clear strip through the forest marking the course of the tunnel). I've always guessed that this is something to do with land ownership; the rail companies owning the land vertically above the tunnels and the tree-people not having the right to plant on it... anyone got any other theories, or know the reason?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

